British Library Crime Classics, 2017 reprint of 1934 original
© 2017 Estate of Anthony Rolls
ISBN 978-1-4642-0740-2
John Farringdale (who narrates this tale) and Eric Foster
are cousins; Foster has studied to become a doctor, and Farringdale, two years
younger, is studying to be a lawyer. One
of Farringdale’s mentors, oddly, is a chemist (with interests in other
sciences, including archeology), Frederick Ellingham. The story begins in the summer of 1913. Through his membership in the London
Archeological Union, Foster makes the acquaintance of a famous chemist and
archeologist Tolgen Reisby. And, as a
result of their meeting and mutual interest, Foster is invited to visit Reisby
at his home (Scarweather), in a remote part of Scotland. Foster invites his cousin to come along (in
the spring of 1914).
There, they meet Reisby’s much younger wife Helen (she’s in
her early 20s; Reisby is, as the story opens, in his late 50s) and their young
daughter (Frances). Everything seems to
be splendid, but Foster also seems to be falling in love with Helen (and she, perhaps
with him), which is likely to create complications. Ellingham is also a part of this visit.
Somewhat later, while Foster is there and Farringdale and
Ellingham have returned to England, Foster disappears. The police conclude that he died in a boating
accident and his body is lost in the North Sea.
At this point we are maybe 25% through the book. We do not reach a conclusion until some 13
years later.
However, there is really no suspense. Anyone who has read even an inconsiderable
amount of mystery fiction knows how this is going to end (and Farringdale is
continually dropping hints). So, at
least for me, there was little suspense, and little surprise in what had
transpired. Martin Edwards, in his
introduction, notes that the author (whose real name is Colwyn Edward
Vuillamy) was himself an archeologist of some note. He compares Vuillamy’s crime fiction (not
unfavorably) to that of Francis Iles (Malice
Aforethought, among other books).
Personally, I don’t see the comparison—Iles’ books are truly suspenseful
and psychologically complex.
This example of Vuillamy’s fiction is neither.
No comments:
Post a Comment