ISBN 978-0399-18526-7
Smooth
Operator is definitely not my kind of book; I really don’t read
thrillers much, and that’s definitely how I would categorize this one. Co-written by Stuart Woods and Parnell Hall,
it begins with Woods’ long-time (30+ books so far) series character, New York
lawyer Stone Barrington, being hauled off a yacht in New York and flown to Washington to meet
with the President. Before he can even
get to the White House, someone takes a shot at him. The problem is that the daughter of the Speaker
of the House has been kidnapped and the kidnappers are insisting that he (a
conservative Republican) force a vote on a veterans’ benefit bill with no amendments
and no riders. (Why is a good
question.) Barrington calls in his old
friend Teddy Fay, now (under the name Billy Barnett) a line producer working on
a movie Barrington’s son is producing).
Fay is an ex-CIA agent with a dicey record.
After much travail, and an astounding body count, all ends
more or less well. As I said, this is
not really my kind of book. I found the
characters, including Barrington, Fay and the principal bad guys,
under-developed and one-dimensional. (In
general, and the authors deserve credit for this, the women in the book are all
strong and capable people, including the Speaker’s kidnapped daughter, who
never gives up on an escape.) I had a
particular problem with Fay, whose basic approach seems to be to kill whoever
is in his way right now, without much in the way of thought and with absolutely no
hesitation, consideration of alternatives, or remorse. I just cannot identify with or feel that the
character is serving some good end.
But what I had the most trouble with were a number of plot
devices that just didn’t work for me. I’m
not going to go through all of them, but will mention just a couple.
Early on, a congressman is killed by a sniper, who
(providentially) leaves a shell casing at the scene. We subsequently get this report from a CIA
forensic technician who is handling the analysis of the casing (I have omitted
the CIA director’s part of the conversation, which is not really relevant:
“It’s Jenson at ballistics, sir. I’m running tests on the shell casing found
on the rooftop across the street…I noticed something I thought you’d want to
know…The cartridge was standard CIA issue…It’s an exact match for the rounds we
issue…”
Now, I find this implausible. If I were running the CIA, I would not want
the ammunition we used in out handguns and rifles to be easily identifiable (or
identifiable at all) as CIA issue.
Absent the need for some unique sort of ammunition, I’d want to use
plain, off-the-shelf ammo. If for no
other reason, it would mean that, should a CIA operative have to shoot at
someone or something, the agent would not have to worry about collecting the
shell casings.
But in many ways, the biggest problem is what seems to me
to be a misunderstanding of how Congress—and the House of Representatives in
particular—works. The kidnappers want
the Speaker to force a vote on a “clean” veterans’ benefits bill. So, how does a bill get to the floor? It gets drafted. It gets referred to the relevant committee
(or committees). It gets worked over,
possibly re-written or amended. Then it
is placed on the calendar for a vote.
The Speaker cannot just create a bill for a vote, or take an existing
bill and re-write it. And, given the way
the House has been operating—and is shown to be operating in this book—there is
no way a “clean” bill of this sort would be reported out of committee. And even if it were, there’s the problem that
the vote in the House does not send it to the President—there’s another House
of Congress involved. This sort of makes
the kidnappers’ demand silly. They
demand that the Speaker do something that he literally cannot do, and, if one
assumes for the immediate moment that their desire is to get the bill passed
(it’s not, but that’s a different issue), getting it through the House is not
the end.
There are a couple of other plot devices I had trouble
with, because, in both cases, they conflicted with my understanding what one
can find in an autopsy in one instance and what one can discover by tracking
cell phone calls in another.
The narrative moves right along, though, and it’s certainly
easy to continue reading it. I believe
this is the first book by Woods I have ever read. Having met Parnell Hall, and had some
pleasant conversations with him at mystery conventions (and having purchased
all his mysteries), I hope the book does well and makes him rich. But I really can’t recommend that anyone buy
it.
No comments:
Post a Comment