Edward Wilson, The
Envoy
Arcadia Books (September 1, 2009)
ISBN-13: 978-1906413125
Arcadia Books (September 1, 2009)
ISBN-13: 978-1906413125
Kit
Fournier is the CIA bureau chief in London, with diplomatic cover, in 1956,
just as things are heating up in Hungary and in Egypt. And England is possibly inching toward some lessening
of tensions with the USSR and, by the way, wants its own nukes. Which the US is determined to prevent. Fournier, who is apparently in his late 20s,
maybe early 30s, is a rising star in the CIA; his London assignment is a plum
for someone his age.
The
story is fairly convoluted, and the major issues don’t emerge all that quickly
or clearly. And Fournier, for all that
he’s a hot shot, seems consistently to do things that (should) get in the way
of his doing his job. Now, keep in mind
that what I know about the life of a field intelligence agent is derived from
what I have read—mostly from spy novels—so take my comments here for what they
are worth. But take just a couple of
things. Fournier meets (clandestinely) regularly—often—with
his KGB counterpart, and the process is always the same. One of them leaves a marker in the same place
in a London park, always in the same way (pretending to re-tie a shoelace, while
driving a “spike” with a message into the ground and leaving a chalk mark in a
visible location. And they always meet at
the same place. If either of them is
under surveillance, how long do you think this will actually work?
And
Fournier is sexually obsessed with his cousin (Jennifer) who just happened to
be married to one of Britain’s leading physicists working on their fusion bomb
project. And no one seems to have
noticed (well, until the very end). (There
are other behavioral issues as well—Fournier is clearly a bit off-center in a
number of ways.)
A
number of real historical personages (from the Dulles brothers to Eisenhower to
Churchill and Anthony Eden to JFK) make
appearances or are referred to; virtually all these references are disparaging,
which may be how the CIA viewed them all, but still seems odd.
And,
at the end, we have a fairly extended coda telling us what happened after the
story being told in the book has wrapped up.
Maybe we needed that, maybe not.
Wilson
actually writes well, and continuing to read the book is not a hard thing to
do. But the story seemed not as well
thought out, and the character motivations not as well considered or allowed to
emerge from the events as we see them (for example, we learn a lot about some
of the characters after things are pretty well wrapped up). I’ll be giving the following books in this
series a shot, but I can’t say, at this point, that I have high expectations.
No comments:
Post a Comment